Wikileaks has been in the news and the whole thing about Wikileaks is that it makes transparent stuff that has been kept hidden from us. In the UK we had the equivalent of the latest Wikileaks disclosure when MPs expenses were published. And this has got me thinking on the following question: how can organisations use transparency to help their customers and themselves?
If I look at frustrating contact centre experience yesterday (how not to communicate) I find myself thinking that there is real power in the contact centre and the website working together to provide information that is valuable for customers.
For example, the website could display a real-time feed of customer demand and backlog that is hitting the contact centre. Furthermore the website could make available all the historic demand falling on the contact centre – day by day, hour by hour. And the website could provide charting / analysis tools to similar to the ones that financial websites provide if you want to take a look at the share price movements that day, that week, that month, that year etc.
If I had had that information I would have been in a better position to work out when to make contact with the call centre – typically when there is the lowest demand on the call centre and the most available capacity to take calls.
It is a fact that most of us tend to keep the promises that we make in public because we wish to maintain, even enhance, our reputation. Companies can use transparency in the same way. What if companies published the following on a daily basis:
- the volume of contacts coming into the contact centre;
- an analysis of these contacts by category – customers ringing in seeking information, seeking to transact, ringing up because they have a problem and need help to get it resolved, making a complaint, offering ideas on how the company can improve, complimenting the company;
- how the company is doing in terms of SLA – from a customer and internal perspectives;
- an analysis of the complaints by cause e.g. product issues, delivery issues, pricing issues, billing issues, service issues etc;
- what actions the company has taken or is taking to deal with these issues and the impact these actions have made on customers and their experience – hard statistics not fluffy talk with no commitments; and
- customer satisfaction scores – versus last month, last year, against SLAs etc.
By being transparent the company would better engage with customers as it takes courage and commitment to make this kind of information available. And the entire company from the Chairman down would have their reputations and integrity at stake: that tends to be one of the most powerful motivators to fix the things that are broken.
Clearly, if customers can see that the company is taking things on that matter to customers and making progress – climbing up the hill – they are likely to support the company, even pitch in and help it to improve.
Any company, any executive, that is truly committed to competing on the basis of creating superior value for their customers the kind of transparency that I have outlined above should occur as a wonderful opportunity to take the lead, to differentiate itself, to build customer engagement and to attract new customers by word of mouth thus cutting down on acquisition costs. I wonder which company will go first and embrace this kind of transparency?